trying to recall .. so, i would double check this, but --
> Perhaps this is because of my WO/EOF background, but I had always
> assumed that modifying anything in the validate* methods would be a
> Bad Thing and never tried doing it.
is this because WO/EOF specifically guides you *not* to put any side-
effect code into the validate* methods.
but i want to say this was ok .. since there were other delegate
methods to tidy up before validateFor* was invoked ..
(now - if i could just remember which one .. hmm. is that right?)
> I can't say I ever read it in regards to Cayenne, but it feels like
> the right thing to me.
> Not sure why it changed in behavior, though.
in cayenne -- there is no equivalent delegate .. and i believe the
right/best way to handle this situation is to implement the side-
effects in validateFor*().
-mk
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Nov 27 2006 - 14:12:55 EST