Bumping the heap size up is probably fine, but I also suspect Frank
might be trying to read in too much data given his previous postings
using LIKE expressions. He may be getting back tens of thousands of
rows, if not more. Perhaps his application requires that, though.
/dev/mrg
On 2/15/07, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
> You are being too picky. Why is this not a solution? Default 64m heap
> size for the JVM is not enough for most applications nowadays ;-)
>
> Andrus
>
>
> On Feb 15, 2007, at 2:47 AM, Juergen Saar wrote:
>
> > This is a workaround, but not a solution ...
> >
> > -sorry-
> > --- Juregen ---
> >
> > 2007/2/14, Frank <farocc..otmail.com>:
> >>
> >> Hi Andrus,
> >>
> >> I bumped the JVM up to 512m
> >> This resolved my issue.
> >> I also removed AS400 fields not needed in my query to help reduce
> >> memory
> >> requirements.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Frank
> >>
> >>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Feb 15 2007 - 09:28:05 EST