Re: commitChanges() doesn't imply commit in db ?

From: jerome moliere (jerome.molier..mail.com)
Date: Tue Apr 03 2007 - 13:15:41 EDT

  • Next message: Michael Gentry: "Re: commitChanges() doesn't imply commit in db ?"

    2007/4/3, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org>:
    >
    > One more shot in the dark. I've seen Sybase standard driver behave
    > unpredictably (I won't have access to Sybase until the end of the
    > week to try it). Can you run the same test with jTDS driver?

    yes that's done.... same results
    Thanks for your help
    Cheers
    jerome

    http://jtds.sourceforge.net/
    >
    > Andrus
    >
    >
    > On Apr 3, 2007, at 12:35 PM, jerome moliere wrote:
    > > 2007/4/3, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org>:
    > >>
    > >> While I've never seen hung transactions in my apps, there were other
    > >> users [1] who are seeing some strangeness. So let's try to figure out
    > >> what's going on.
    > >>
    > >> 1. What DataSource are you using - Cayenne-provided or some other
    > >> (e.g. container-provided). Either should work of course, but this
    > >> information should help in debugging.
    > >
    > >
    > > cayenne provided one...
    > >
    > > 2. Are you using container-managed transactions? If you are, you have
    > >> to check "container-managed transactions" [2], and ensure that
    > >> whatever transaction mechanism is used (i.e. explicit J2EE
    > >> UserTransactions), you commit them explicitly.
    > >
    > >
    > > no CMT.... these samples are made in a very simple context, STAND
    > > ALONE
    > > applications
    > > no J2EE stuff here...
    > >
    > >
    > > --
    > > Jerome Moliere - Mentor/J
    > > http://romjethoughts.blogspot.com/
    > > auteur Eyrolles
    >
    > 

    -- 
Jerome Moliere - Mentor/J
http://romjethoughts.blogspot.com/
auteur Eyrolles

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Apr 03 2007 - 13:16:16 EDT