Re: commitChanges() doesn't imply commit in db ?

From: Andrus Adamchik (andru..bjectstyle.org)
Date: Wed Apr 04 2007 - 09:14:20 EDT

  • Next message: jerome moliere: "Re: commitChanges() doesn't imply commit in db ?"

    On Apr 4, 2007, at 5:27 AM, jerome moliere wrote:

    > I need determinism.. (I 'm using the JTDS driver now)

    Yeah, determinism is good.

    > one big difference is that now : cayenne uses the generic db
    > adapter because
    > the JDBC driver doesn't understand the meta data returned from db...

    This can be forced - select the DataNode in the modeler, click on
    "adapter" tab and enter "org.apache.cayenne.dba.sybase.SybaseAdapter".

    Andrus

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Apr 04 2007 - 09:16:08 EDT