Re: commitChanges() doesn't imply commit in db ?

From: Michael Gentry (blacknex..mail.com)
Date: Wed Apr 04 2007 - 09:39:40 EDT

  • Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: commitChanges() doesn't imply commit in db ?"

    Well, you can vi the XML file and force it. :-) That's the nice thing
    about the Modeler -- you get a GUI *and* you can hand-edit the files if
    needed.

    As for setting up an account, that might be nice, but I know I personally
    can't access it from work (firewall restrictions), so it would be a while
    before I could try anything. Not sure about Andrus or others.

    Thanks,

    /dev/mrg

    On 4/4/07, jerome moliere <jerome.molier..mail.com> wrote:
    >
    > 2007/4/4, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org>:
    > >
    > >
    > > On Apr 4, 2007, at 5:27 AM, jerome moliere wrote:
    > >
    > >
    > > > I need determinism.. (I 'm using the JTDS driver now)
    > >
    > > Yeah, determinism is good.
    > >
    > > > one big difference is that now : cayenne uses the generic db
    > > > adapter because
    > > > the JDBC driver doesn't understand the meta data returned from db...
    > >
    > > This can be forced - select the DataNode in the modeler, click on
    > > "adapter" tab and enter "org.apache.cayenne.dba.sybase.SybaseAdapter".
    >
    >
    >
    > this can be forced with 'vi' !!! I'm using the cgen ant task.... don't
    > use
    > the modeler anymore (used just once then the old manner -) )
    >
    >
    > for the problem, do you want to access my server (at home) with a sybase
    > ASE ?
    > I could give you an account and we could make some tests ?
    >
    > cheers
    > jerome
    >
    > Andrus
    > >
    > >
    >
    >
    > --
    > Jerome Moliere - Mentor/J
    > http://romjethoughts.blogspot.com/
    > auteur Eyrolles
    >

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Apr 04 2007 - 09:40:31 EDT