You may also try to reduce the "Max Number of Objects" for the
DataDomain from the default 10000 to something smaller.
Also are you setting "-Xmx" to something small? You may want to start
with the higher values, if only to be able to see the effect of
various memory saving strategies before the app crashes.
Andrus
On May 14, 2007, at 10:39 PM, Tomi N/A wrote:
> 2007/5/14, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org>:
>>
>> On May 14, 2007, at 8:57 PM, Tomi N/A wrote:
>>
>> > mca = (MyClassA)
>> > Util.getCommonContext().objectFromDataRow(SpisUtil.class, dr,
>> false);
>>
>> This is the source of the memory leak. You may want to replace the
>> context after processing an X number of rows.
>
> No effect, captain.
> I replaced
> Util.getCommonContext().objectFromDataRow(SpisUtil.class, dr,
> false);
> with
> Util.getNewContext().objectFromDataRow(SpisUtil.class, dr, false)
> where getNewContext() does
> return Configuration.getSharedConfiguration().getDomain
> ().createDataContext();
>
> I understand I wouldn't want to create a new DataContext for *every*
> DataObject, but I had hoped it would be proof of concept.
>
> Any other ideas, comments, hints as to why the above approach
> didn't work?
>
> Cheers,
> t.n.a.
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon May 14 2007 - 15:50:38 EDT