It's not a hijacking. It is interesting to point out that JPA does not
support tables without PKs -- I really should learn more about JPA soon. I
can understand why, too (need to know what to update and how to make joins,
etc). I'm kind of curious if Cayenne supports PK-less for read-only data
now, though. Seems to me that could be a useful thing.
/dev/mrg
On 6/6/07, Craig L Russell <Craig.Russel..un.com> wrote:
>
> I don't want to hijack this thread, but just point out that JPA does
> not support tables without primary key; JDO does (including updates)
> as an optional feature.
>
> Craig
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Jun 06 2007 - 12:42:50 EDT