And note that if you call
"myFirstObject.addToMyRelation(mySecondObject)", then
"mySecondObject.setTheObject(myFirstObject)" is also called. It
doesn't matter which side of the relationship you call. Furthermore,
if mySecondObject.getTheObject() = myZeroObject beforehand, this
object will also be removed from the relationship list automatically.
Ie, everything "just works" out of the box with no extra effort on
your part.
On 6/19/07, Mike Kienenberger <mkienen..mail.com> wrote:
> Unlike Hibernate, the object graph is maintained even before you save.
>
> If you use "mySecondObject.setTheObject(myFirstObject)", then the
> equivalent for "myFirstObject.addToMyRelation(mySecondObject)" is
> already done for you.
>
> This is why you're seeing two copies -- you're effectively calling the
> addToMyRelationship twice.
>
>
>
> On 6/19/07, Alexander Lamb (dev) <alam..ac.com> wrote:
> > Hello list,
> >
> > It looks like "myFirstObject.addToMyRelation(mySecondObject)" does
> > not check if mySecondObject is already in the relationship. Is that
> > correct?
> >
> > If so, here is my problem.
> >
> > I know that I can simply do:
> >
> > mySecondObject.setTheObject(myFirstObject)
> >
> > and then once saved, somehow the reverse relationship will be updated.
> >
> > The problem is that I need the reverse relationship before I save.
> > Therefore I do:
> >
> > mySecondObject.setTheObject(myFirstObject)
> >
> > and
> >
> > myFirstObject.addToMyRelation(mySecondObject)
> >
> > In order to have my object graph correct before save.
> >
> > Unfortunately, doing this it seems like mySecondObject gets inserted
> > twice in the List. If I restart the app, everything is fine again.
> >
> > Thanks for any hint!
> >
> > Alex
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Jun 19 2007 - 12:17:48 EDT