Cayenne is a Framework that brings one of the best ORM available
and it would be foolish to implement such a horrible scenarium.
I think this special problem has to be solved by YOU
and not by the cayenne-team
Sorry ...
--- Juergen ---
2007/6/20, Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.harbo..ylin.com>:
>
> In the link below it says that relationships does not work across
> databases "as it will require Cayenne to do in memory cartesian
> product processing".
>
> What does this qualifier mean? Does it mean that it is possible to
> enable this, but it would take a lot of memory? That this feature was
> considered, but rejected as it would have not worked in all cases?
>
> For the cases that we need this, there is no problem for Cayenne to
> have both tables completely in memory (always < 1000 records) so I'm
> not concerned about CPU processing power or memory consumption.
>
> Has any work been done on supporting this?
>
>
>
> We've got a real database (Derby) that has relationships to other
> existing datbases(MS Access/FoxPro databases). We can't move the
> existing databases into Derby due to bug-by-bug compatibility
> problems.
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/CAY/multiple-databases-example.html
>
> --
> Øyvind Harboe
> http://www.zylin.com - eCos ARM & FPGA developer kit
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Jun 21 2007 - 02:06:26 EDT