Re: [C3] logging

From: Bryan Lewis (brya..aine.rr.com)
Date: Fri Sep 14 2007 - 10:41:38 EDT

Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: [POLL]: Cayenne 3.0 -- Java 1.4 or 5 support?"

Previous message: Gilberto C Andrade: "Re: [POLL]: Cayenne 3.0 -- Java 1.4 or 5 support?"
In reply to: Michael Gentry: "Re: [C3] logging"
Next in thread: Michael Gentry: "Re: [C3] logging"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

You might be amused by this blog posting:

http://arsenalist.com/2007/09/12/logging-abstraction-is-utterly-pointless/

Michael Gentry wrote:
> I thought that part was amusing. I have no vested interest in any
> logging decision. I was rather happy with printf() in my C code. :-)
> However, after seeing errors in logs in legacy code I had to maintain
> which said "An error has occurred" and no context provided, I do know
> the benefits of good logging.
>
> /dev/mrg
>
> On 9/14/07, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
>
>> Yeah... "It does things right: Logger, not Log." That's an
>> improvement! :-)
>>
>> Andrus
>>
>
>

Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: [POLL]: Cayenne 3.0 -- Java 1.4 or 5 support?"
Previous message: Gilberto C Andrade: "Re: [POLL]: Cayenne 3.0 -- Java 1.4 or 5 support?"
In reply to: Michael Gentry: "Re: [C3] logging"
Next in thread: Michael Gentry: "Re: [C3] logging"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Sep 14 2007 - 10:42:22 EDT