Re: Basic ROP questions

From: Kevin Menard (kmenar..ervprise.com)
Date: Fri Sep 14 2007 - 16:16:29 EDT

  • Next message: Kevin Menard: "Re: Basic ROP questions"

    Answering my first question . . . That's a definite no. The parent class
    implementations are quite different. So, I may just have to break down and
    create utility classes that accept DOs as arguments. A bit of pain, but
    it'll reduce the code duplication. 

    -- 
Kevin

    On 9/14/07 1:09 PM, "Kevin Menard" <kmenar..ervprise.com> wrote:

    > I'm just getting started on a ROP project using Cayenne 3.0.  In my server
> classes, I had a large amount of utility methods attached to my DOs.
> Clearly, there's a fair amount of overlap between the server classes and the
> client classes.
> 
> A couple brief questions then follow:
> 
> 1) Will modifying the Velocity template to subclass the servers classes help
> reduce the code duplication?  Will this even work?
> 
> 2) Will packaging either the server or the client classes into distributable
> JARs gain me anything?
> 
> I'll try these out on my own anyway, but before I got too bogged down with
> that, I just wanted to see what's doable and what's not.  I haven't looked
> into the finer details of relationships between the server and client
> classes.
> 
> Thanks,
> Kevin
> 

    --

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Sep 14 2007 - 16:17:10 EDT