I'll be sticking with classic cayenne.
I've noticed the generic additions... mostly, I think that's a
positive thing, but I think there could be some improvements in the
generic definitions.
I'll submit jiras as I encounter them.
Robert
On Mar 31, 2008, at 3/313:25 PM , Michael Gentry wrote:
> Are you planning on sticking with Classic Cayenne or using JPA?
> Classic Cayenne is mostly the same, although there have been Java
> generics additions (for good or bad), etc. You've noticed the
> lifecycle stuff.
>
> /dev/mrg
>
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Robert Zeigler
> <robert..uregumption.com> wrote:
>> I'm looking at upgrading a medium to large app from cayenne 2.0.3 to
>> 3.0 M3.
>> It's a tapestry3/cayenne application. I looked over http://cayenne.apache.org/doc/upgrade.html
>> .
>> The only thing listed there that may bite me is that the app makes
>> some use of Derived db entities, so I'll have to fix that.
>> I also seem to recall from the list that using setPersistenceState as
>> a location for initializing properties of new objects is deprecated
>> in
>> favor of using the lifecycle callbacks.
>> Anything else major?
>>
>> TIA!
>>
>> Robert
>>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Mar 31 2008 - 17:00:37 EDT