Dear Andrus,
Yes this is very disappointing since manual transaction with no
autocommit does not work for us.
Perhaps we need to clarify this?
At this point, the only working way is to use directly JDBC with
autocommit (which is not an option for us).
Neither the use of manual transaction with no autocommit nor the use of
TransactionDelegate with autocommit makes our problem solved.
And for your information, we have performed our tests with Cayenne 2.0.4
and 3.0M3 as well and unfortunately it doesn't make any difference.
We hope this summary clarify the actual state of this issue.
Many thanks for your kind assistance,
Best regards,
Marc
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:andru..bjectstyle.org]
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 11:10 AM
To: use..ayenne.apache.org
Subject: Re: Stored proc returning result set (and output params) with
MS SQL server
I am surprised about autocommit making a difference vs. a manual
transaction with no autocommit, as the later worked for me in my
previous test, so now everything I say is just a guess. One other
difference that I noticed is that I tested using Cayenne 3.0 trunk
(soon to be M4), and you are on 2.0.4. I'll need to try it with 2.0 in
my next test...
Andrus
On Apr 29, 2008, at 12:00 PM, Marc Gabriel-Willem wrote:
> Hello Andrus,
>
> We've set the autocommit to true using a TransactionDelegate but
> somehow, it appears the flag is later on reset automatically to false.
> As you advised, the autocommit has been set to true in
> willAddConnection, but when didRollback or didCommit is called, we
> figured out the flag has been reset to false. So it seems the
> setAutoCommit is not taken into account, and then of course our issue
> still persists.
>
> Please can you advise?
>
> Thanks a lot
>
> Marc
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:andru..bjectstyle.org]
> Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 2:48 PM
> To: use..ayenne.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Stored proc returning result set (and output params) with
> MS SQL server
>
>
> On Apr 28, 2008, at 3:41 PM, Marc Gabriel-Willem wrote:
>
>> Dear Andrus,
>>
>> Have you got a chance to work on the problem?
>
> No, not yet.
>
>> For a summary, our investigations show that using JDBC, the 'auto
>> commit' attribute set to 'true' solve the problem. Is it possible to
>> execute the stored procedure using that behavior? We already looked
>> to
>> set that flag to a particular connection within cayenne, but without
>> any
>> success...
>
> You may try using a TransactionDelegate that sets autocommit to true
> based on some ThreadLocal variable state from within
> 'willAddConnection':
>
> http://cayenne.apache.org/doc/understanding-transactions.html
>
> Andrus
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are
> confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient(s)
> only. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
> taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or
> entities other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you
> have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender
> immediately and destroy the material whether stored on a computer or
> otherwise.
>
> DISCLAIMER: Any views or opinions presented within this e-mail are
> solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of
> SIDE International S.A. - EastNets Group, unless otherwise
> specifically stated.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Please consider the environment before deciding to print this email.
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Apr 29 2008 - 08:28:29 EDT