I was looking for any clues in the code, nothing concrete... And I
found it. The recent fix to CAY-785 deprecated and stopped calling
"Configuration.getDataSourceFactory()" replacing it with
"Configuration.getDataSourceFactory(String)". So you need to override
the new method. Also I checked in a fix that restores backwards
compatibility. It should be available from the Hudson CI server soon
(build #109 or newer).
Andrus
On May 3, 2008, at 3:21 AM, Brian Nelson wrote:
> Andrus,
>
> I'm not sure exactly how you want the code sample. If you need me to
> provide a self contained app
> I can do that. For now I'll just copy the code from my app so you
> can take a look at it. I have a
> static method that configures my custom DataSourceFactory. The call
> to DbUtils.openDb succeeds,
> but the getDataSourceFactory method in CompanyConfiguration is never
> called.
>
> public class DbUtils {
> private static DataContext globalContext;
> private static DataContext estimateContext;
> private static DataContext roomContext;
> private static DataContext assemblyContext;
> private static DataContext partsContext;
>
> public static void openDb(String pathToDb) throws Exception {
> try {
> CompanyDataSourceFactory.setDbPath(pathToDb);
>
> Configuration
> .initializeSharedConfiguration(CompanyConfiguration.class);
> Configuration config = Configuration.getSharedConfiguration();
> DataDomain domain = config.getDomain();
>
> globalContext = DataContext.createDataContext(domain.getName());
> estimateContext = DataContext.createDataContext(domain.getName());
> roomContext = DataContext.createDataContext(domain.getName());
> assemblyContext = DataContext.createDataContext(domain.getName());
> partsContext = DataContext.createDataContext(domain.getName());
> } catch (Exception e) {
> throw new Exception("Unable to initialize database!", e);
> }
> }
> }
>
> public class CompanyConfiguration extends DefaultConfiguration {
>
> private static CompanyDataSourceFactory factory = new
> CompanyDataSourceFactory();
>
> ..verride
> public DataSourceFactory getDataSourceFactory() {
> return factory;
> }
>
> }
>
> public class CompanyDataSourceFactory implements DataSourceFactory {
>
> private static DataSource ds = null;
> private static String dbPath = "Companies/db";
>
> public static void setDbPath(String val) {
> dbPath = val;
> }
>
> ..verride
> public DataSource getDataSource(String arg0) throws Exception {
> if(dbPath.startsWith("server")) {
> // server:host
> ClientDataSource40 tmpDS = new ClientDataSource40();
> String[] sArray = dbPath.split(":");
> tmpDS.setServerName(sArray[1]);
> tmpDS.setDatabaseName("db");
> tmpDS.setUser("user");
> tmpDS.setPassword("pass");
> ds = tmpDS;
> } else {
> EmbeddedDataSource40 tmpDS = new EmbeddedDataSource40();
> tmpDS.setDatabaseName(dbPath);
> tmpDS.setUser("user");
> tmpDS.setPassword("db");
> ds = tmpDS;
> }
>
>
>
> return ds;
> }
>
> ..verride
> public void initializeWithParentConfiguration(Configuration arg0) {
> }
>
> }
>
> Hopefully that's enough. If not let me know what I should provide.
>
> Thanks for your help!
>
> Brian
>
> --- Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
>
>> Strange. That should still work the same. The only change to
>> Configuration since M3 was related to the DataSourceFactory handling
>> (CAY-785)... Do you have a code example that demonstrates the
>> problem?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Andrus
>>
>>
>> On May 1, 2008, at 10:29 PM, Brian Nelson wrote:
>>> I've been using a custom subclass of DefaultConfiguration to
>>> customize my database connection.
>>> This works great with 3.0M3. However, today I upgraded to the
>>> snapshot build and it seems to be
>>> ignoring the custom configuration class I pass into the
>>> Configuration.initializeSharedConfiguration method. Has the way
>>> custom configurations work
>>> changed?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance!
>>>
>>> Brian
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sat May 03 2008 - 03:06:30 EDT