I don't have any opinion on the actual method involved, but when you
remove it, don't have it silently ignore the setting. Either get rid
of it completely (so compilation/runtime breaks) or have it continue
to function ..eprecated with BIG warnings in the logs).
I'd hate to be a developer who misses this in the release notes after
upgrading some application, and then tries to figure out why things
don't work as expected any more...
On 5/3/08, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
>
> On May 3, 2008, at 6:57 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
>
> > a set of queries with a large # of combinations of parameters, but all
> searching the same underlying data set that rarely changes
> >
>
> On the other hand, even this example is better served by using query cache.
> For a marginal increase in memory use, it should give much better access
> speed and refresh manageability. So I am out of examples of why
> "setRefreshingObjects(false)" is good, but I'll wait for the comments before
> removing it.
>
> Andrus
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon May 05 2008 - 13:27:26 EDT