On May 5, 2008, at 10:39 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> To me, that sounded like you were going to change the behavior rather
> than just mark the method as..eprecated.
I was planning to do both. Although we may decide to be gentle about
it and deprecate the method, but preserve the functionality (which
will put a bit of extra maintenance burden on us).
I am leaning towards the first option (deprecate and stop invoking),
especially since the nature of the change results in enhanced data
consistency, so there won't be any unpleasant surprises.
Andrus
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon May 05 2008 - 15:48:46 EDT