On Mon, 19 May 2008 11:07:11 -0400
"Mike Kienenberger" <mkienen..mail.com> wrote:
> I'm not really sure why you don't use a regular java bean object to do
> this.
Because of the base class. I don't want to have my renderer check the
class to decide how to handle it. What I could try would be to subclass
from DataObject without having any info in the DataMap. Not sure how
Cayenne would like that though.
> However, I believe you could create a DataMap for all of these objects
> in a separate DataNode. You don't have to create a table for them in
> the database.
That could be a solution. Ugly, but still working.
> You might even be able to get away with having them in the same
> DataMap, provided you don't try to update/insert/delete them during a
> commit. There's no requirement that you create an actual table on
> the database unless you execute sql accessing that table.
Yes, I thought something like that. But still an ugly solution...
Cheers,
Adrian
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue May 20 2008 - 15:41:07 EDT