There's been some effort to keep only the essential non-redundant
methods in the ObjectContext interface to make it more flexible for
nested/ROP operation and to simplify its proxying. I am neutral to
adding the new method to the *DataContext class*, as long as it
doesn't make it to the interface.
Andrus
On Jun 4, 2008, at 4:36 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
> This seems reasonable. I'll open a ticket for it later.
>
> Thanks,
>
> /dev/mrg
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Borut Bolina
> <borut.bolcin..mail.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> If I have a collection of transient CayenneDataObjects with no
>> relations
>> between any of them and want to persist them, it would be
>> convenient to
>> "say":
>>
>> context.registerObjects(myCayenneDataObjects); // sets state to NEW
>> context.commitChanges();
>>
>> Now there is only a singular form of this method
>> http://cayenne.apache.org/doc/api/org/apache/cayenne/ObjectContext.html#registerNewObject(java.lang.Object)
>>
>> But probably there is a reason for not having this method.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Borut
>>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Jun 04 2008 - 09:47:03 EDT