On Aug 22, 2008, at 3:07 PM, Tore Halset wrote:
> On Aug 22, 2008, at 13:36, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
>> Interesting... I am not using either for anything complex lately,
>> preferring manual SQL scripts executed with dbpatch Ant task, so I
>> am a bit out of the loop.
>
> The sql-scripts is a very solid way to work, but some people would
> probably prefer the ease of the modeler for such tasks. The merger
> is also very good for verifying that your model and database is in
> sync.
Totally agree. I just posted that to explain my own ignorance :-)
>> I would also love to have less redundancy and drop DbGenerator at a
>> point when there is a complete and more powerful replacement.
>
> Merge call DbGenerator where DbGenerator has the needed
> functionality. The reason for this is to save code and testing. It
> could easily be refactored when we are happy with the merger.
Excellent. I'll keep that in mind.
Andrus
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Aug 22 2008 - 08:25:38 EDT