I'm not familiar with MSSQL, but in MySQL that's definitely the case - both database and table visibility are opt in, not opt out.
-----Original Message-----
From: oyvindharbo..mail.com [mailto:oyvindharboe@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Øyvind Harboe
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 4:16 AM
To: use..ayenne.apache.org
Subject: Re: Problems with MS SQL Server and creating merger tokens
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Tore Halset <halse..vv.ntnu.no> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> The merger get the table info using DbLoader that does a
> jdbcConnection.getMetaData().getTables() to pick up info on all the tables.
> My guess is that the database/jdbc-driver simply does not list the tables
> for your misconfigured user.
So that means that there *is* no way to distinguish between the case where there
are no tables and where the database user does not have access to enumerate
the tables?
Not even in principle?
Ouch!
I wonder how I might deal with this in my application, especially
since it is intended to
run unsupervised(or by a user not capable of supervising).
-- Øyvind Harboe http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html ARM7 ARM9 XScale Cortex JTAG debugger and flash programmer
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Sep 25 2008 - 13:04:57 EDT