Re: Does Cayenne require a reversed relationship?

From: Mike Kienenberger (mkienen..mail.com)
Date: Sat Mar 28 2009 - 13:39:32 EDT

  • Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: Does Cayenne require a reversed relationship?"

    I don't know if it's true for Cayenne 3.0 -- that restriction may now
    be relaxed.
    However, it was true for Cayenne before 3.0.

    But in any case, you can delete the reverse object relationships from
    the model. Those are not required.

    On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Joseph Schmidt
    <joseph_schmidt7..ahoo.com> wrote:
    >
    > Sorry, but I'm a confused now :).
    >
    >> It used to be true
    > and now it is no true anymore?
    > Or is this so jut for Cayenne3?
    >
    >> that the reverse
    >> db relationship was required, but
    >> the reverse obj relationship was not required.  From
    >> the application's
    >> point of view, it doesn't have to be there.
    > I'm doing reverse engineering so of existing DBs, so I'm not
    > editing the DB part since I'm not going to change the scheme.
    >
    > Thanks,
    > Joseph
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sat Mar 28 2009 - 13:40:17 EDT