I should add that on the server side, the usual serialization pattern
was to serialize the entire context. This way there's no need to think
which part of the object graph needs to be serialized, and on de-
serialization objects are automatically attached to the context.
Haven't tried it on the client.
Andrus
On Mar 29, 2009, at 10:34 AM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
> Why not? ROP objects are obviously serializable, and their
> "objectContext"
> field is transient, so no problems should occur. You should only
> watch that
> all objects have correct persistenceState (e.g. they are not COMMITED
> without being registered to objectContext)
>
> 2009/3/27 Zissis Trabaris <z.trabari..nsysware.com>
>
>> The question at hand is: Given an ROP client object retrieved from
>> the
>> database, can I serialize it to disk, later on, de-serialize it to
>> memory, register it to a context and use it as if it came from the
>> database? Some caveats of course... Assume the database did not
>> change
>> since the serialization process took place.
>>
>>
>>
>> Zissis Trabaris * Chief Technology Officer * INSYSWARE * 3235 West
>> River
>> Road, Grand Island, New York, 14072, USA
>> Mobile (716) 930-5654 * Office (518) 636-4118 * Fax (716) 625-1305 *
>> z.trabari..nsysware.com <mailto:%20%20z.trabaris@insysware.com<20%2520z.trabaris@insysware.com
>> >>
>> *
>> www.insysware.com <http://www.insysware.com/>
>>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sun Mar 29 2009 - 04:10:43 EDT