Here is one that I found:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAY-419
The description in the Jira is a bit vague, but the idea seems to be
the same.
Andrus
On Jun 10, 2009, at 6:40 PM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
> #1. I can have a look. Please find JIRA or create a new one
>
> #2. You should create table ID as ObjAttrbute and attach
> ExpressionFactory.noMatchExp("id", getId())
>
>
> 2009/6/10 Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.harbo..ylin.com>
>
>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Andrus Adamchik<andru..bjectstyle.org
>> >
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jun 5, 2009, at 11:43 AM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
>>>
>>>> 1. I can't use expression.match() because it will fail when the
>>>> expression contains
>>>> an array in the path. I.e. matchExp(role.members.user, user) here
>>>> "members"
>>>> will return a list, and this causes an exception for .match(),
>>>> whereas
>> it
>>>> works
>>>> fine in a query.
>>>
>>> Yeah, this is a known limitation for in memory processing. We
>>> probably
>> even
>>> have a Jira to fix it.
>>
>> If you find the JIRA # I'll see if we can't have a go at fixing it...
>>
>>>> 2. In the above statement I don't know how to add a andExp() to
>>>> only
>>>> return
>>>> "this", so I get a bigger query result than I need + unecessary
>>>> post
>>>> processing.
>>>> I've run into this problem previously as well, without finding an
>>>> elegant solution.
>>>
>>> Not sure I understand this.
>>
>> Since I can't use .match() I want to run expression against the
>> database to
>> see if "this" matches the filter, but I don't want *lots* of returned
>> results where I need to check that "this" is in the list of objects.
>>
>> If I could create an expression that filtered out all objects that
>> was not
>> "this", then I would know that the object matched the expression if
>> a single record was returned.
>>
>> --
>> Øyvind Harboe
>> Embedded software and hardware consulting services
>> http://consulting.zylin.com
>>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Jun 11 2009 - 03:15:55 EDT