I am biased, but I find 3.0M6 quite stable.
Personally, I find the 'development' labeling on apache.org misleading.
It's way more solid than that. (We've had it in production for quite
some time - on large internet site.)
If you're starting from scratch - I would recommend 3.x
There's been a lot of great work that's gone into this branch.
If I'm missing something here - please feel free to set the record straight.
No worries.
2cents,
-Matt
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Michael Gentry<mgentr..asslight.net> wrote:
> BTW, I'm writing something I expect to go into production in the
> October time-frame. I'm using 3.0M6 and have every expectation that
> it will work. Especially since I'm sticking to the "Classic" Cayenne
> feature set, which is stable and has seen improvements in 3.x, too.
>
> mrg
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Bret Gregory<bmg12..ahoo.com> wrote:
>> I have read a little on Cayenne 3.0 and it sounds like it is more inline, but the fact that it is not
>> stable is a little disconcerting to me since I am writing something that will be in production before
>> it is even gets into a release candidate stage
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Aug 26 2009 - 10:28:45 EDT