I'm in preparations for 3.0 ... but there was a lot of trouble this year, so
I didn't get as far as I planned ...
For using 3.0 in productive environment ... Is there a time-scale for the
final 3.0?
2009/11/25 Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org>
> Do you have an option of trying this with 3.0? There were a few bug fixes
> related to unstable data types in ObjectIds (e.g. the same ID can have a PK
> mapping as a BigDecimal or Integer depending on how object was obtained).
> Could be something related.
>
> Andrus
>
>
>
> On Nov 25, 2009, at 10:32 AM, Juergen Saar wrote:
>
> I'm using Version 2.0.4 ...
>>
>> 2009/11/25 Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org>
>>
>> Don't yet know what might be causing it, but what version of Cayenne are
>>> you using?
>>>
>>> Andrus
>>>
>>>
>>> On Nov 25, 2009, at 9:49 AM, Juergen Saar wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>>
>>>> we're using cayenne for the web-interface of a 20 year old project with
>>>> meaningful keys. We don't use tapestry. The keys are handled in the
>>>> validateForSave().
>>>>
>>>> In some cases after commit there is an Exception: "Temporary ID hasn't
>>>> been
>>>> replaced on commit"
>>>> The values of the Dataobject are OK and the Informations put to database
>>>> are
>>>> correct.
>>>>
>>>> In the Objects that cause this Exception I can't see any difference to
>>>> Objects that don't cause this Execption.
>>>>
>>>> Is there anything I can do to force the replacement if the Temp ID or to
>>>> prevent this Exception?
>>>>
>>>> Caching in cayenne is disabled, because there are many other
>>>> applications
>>>> also manipulating data in database.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Any hint would help ...
>>>> -Juergen-
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Nov 25 2009 - 08:47:59 EST