Re: split expressions

From: Lachlan Deck (lachlan.dec..mail.com)
Date: Wed Jan 13 2010 - 20:59:17 EST

  • Next message: Lachlan Deck: "Re: split expressions"

    On 13/01/2010, at 9:00 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:

    > On Jan 13, 2010, at 11:53 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
    >
    >>>
    >>> That is, you might combine expressions with:
    >>>
    >>> exp1.and(exp2, Expression.SPLIT_PATH)
    >>> exp1.and(exp2, Expression.MERGE_PATH)
    >>> exp1.and(exp2)
    >>
    >> I don't understand how the second argument is applicable in the context of "and"?
    >
    > Actually I think I see what you mean here. Unfortunately this will only work for joining simple key/value expression, but won't work when joining more complex expressions that have more than one key/value pair.

    Essentially the idea is this: rather than having users define and track aliases, tell the framework to do it for me :-)

    with regards,

    --
    

    Lachlan Deck



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Jan 13 2010 - 21:00:00 EST