Re: Patched Ant still applicable to Eclipse 2.1.3?

From: Ulrich Köster (ulric..bjectstyle.org)
Date: Thu Mar 25 2004 - 14:04:02 EST

  • Next message: Jake MacMullin: "EOModeler crashes when trying to generate Java templates"

    Am 25.03.2004 um 15:48 schrieb JR Ruggentaler:

    > I downloaded the patch using the link from the WOProject download
    > page. Is there another patch?
    > URL to download:
    > http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/woproject/
    > org.eclipse.core.ant.patched_for_Eclipe_2.1.x_and_3.0.0_M5.tar.gz?
    > download

    Yes.

    http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/woproject/
    org.eclipse.core.ant.patched_for_Eclipe_2.1.x.tar.gz?download

    The upload is just some seconds old. It's possible that the file is not
    available on all mirrors.

    Ulrich

    >  
    > J.R.
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Kaelin Colclasure [mailto:kaeli..cm.org]
    > Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 8:42 AM
    > To: Ulrich Köster
    > Cc: Woproject
    > Subject: Re: Patched Ant still applicable to Eclipse 2.1.3?
    >
    > On Mar 25, 2004, at 12:35 AM, Ulrich Köster wrote:
    >
    >
    > Hi Kaelin,
    >
    >
    > the patched ant plugin for Eclipse 2.1.3 is in the cvs. When I have
    > some time I'll upload it to sf.net.
    >
    >
    > Ulrich
    >
    >
    > Ahh good. I can definitely confirm that the Eclipse instability is
    > still present in 2.1.3 without the patch. :-/ Thanks again Ulrich!
    >
    >
    > -- Kaelin
    >
    >
    > Am 24.03.2004 um 22:57 schrieb Kaelin Colclasure:
    >
    >
    > Is the patched Ant plug-in still applicable to Eclipse 2.1.3? I
    > notice that the new Eclipse has an org.eclipse.ant.core_2.1.3 folder,
    > while the patched plug-in only has org.eclipse.ant.core_2.1.0,
    > org.eclipse.ant.core_2.1.1 and org.eclipse.ant.core_3.0.0...
    >
    >
    > I did see the message from David Teran regarding the pre-release
    > 2.1.3 versions having an incompatibility with the patch as
    > distributed. Was there a resolution for this in the final 2.1.3
    > release?
    >
    >
    > If I am still required to use the patched plug-in, which one do I
    > use? (I would guess 2.1.1? But then do I need to rename the folder, or
    > just discard the distributed one, or what?)
    >
    >
    > -- Kaelin



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Mar 25 2004 - 14:04:09 EST