Yeah, this particular warning you need to be very careful of. There
are at least two known situations that can cause a fall positive. In
previous releases this was a reliable warning and it will get there
again, I just have to spend some quality time w/ the parser to get
there.
On May 8, 2007, at 9:06 AM, Gavin Eadie wrote:
> At 9:10 PM +1000 5/8/07, Q wrote:
>> Similarly a Quick Fix option in the wod editor to remove element
>> definitions from the wod file that have a no corresponding HTML
>> element error.
>
> ... that never happens, hah! I just moved a large project over to
> Eclipse and found several dozen orphaned 'woddies' !!
>
> One was removal was for the stylesheet embedded "<wo> inside a
> tag" issue (WOL-418) I just logged in Jira, so (a) you need to be
> careful removing these, and (b) I so agree that usage is ugly,
> unnecessary and likely to cause trouble. Consider my wrist
> slapped ... Gav
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue May 08 2007 - 09:11:16 EDT