Pretty much, although that's slightly better than what I initially
had in mind.
On 09/05/2007, at 10:59 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
> you mean so you can "ghost" close tags? like
> <wo:if condition = "$whatever">
> <div>
> <!-- /div -->
> </wo:if>
>
> that's kind of interesting ...
>
> On May 9, 2007, at 8:53 AM, Q wrote:
>
>>
>> On 09/05/2007, at 9:37 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
>>
>>> Unfortunately, you're making an assumption that only
>>> WOConditionals have this behavior, but "any" tag can potentially
>>> have this behavior. In fact, I can think of several components
>>> in Wonder that can have this same behavior (ERXCase, ERXElse,
>>> etc). So this won't really work in the general case .... and
>>> also it's crazy to implement :)
>>
>> Ok, more thought, less caffeine, I get it ;). How about something
>> a little less complicated.
>>
>> Take your idea of being able to exclude a tag block from the
>> parser. But add support for being able to supply additional
>> content into the parser using a suitably structured comment block,
>> however that might look. That way you can provide the parser a
>> suitable representation of any essential elements generated by the
>> excluded block without it getting in the way.
>>
>> --
>> Seeya...Q
>>
>> Quinton Dolan - qdola..mail.com
>> Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
>> Ph: +61 419 729 806
>>
>>
>
-- Seeya...QQuinton Dolan - qdola..mail.com Gold Coast, QLD, Australia Ph: +61 419 729 806
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed May 09 2007 - 09:23:16 EDT