Is this conversation is moving in the direction of deeper changes to
the "WebObjects HTML" than the simple <wo abbreviation and OGnl
enhancements?
Is it sacrilege for me to suggest that some of us write up a proposal
(deadline WWDC) that we take to the larger community? I know many
have 'given up' on Apple, but they still hold a measure of control
over the product that makes me nervous when we consider forking a
WOLips special specification for the HTML. With ideas and code
changes in WOLips coming fast in this area, I wouldn't want us to
paint ourselves into a corner.
Maybe all the key players are already in this mailing list, and maybe
any such fork in the HTML can still be coped with by the overload of
the shipping parser, but I am concerned about the day that someone
not using the WOLips inherits my code, or (gasp) the day Apple
rewrites WOBuilder (dreaming) ... Gav
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed May 09 2007 - 10:03:06 EDT