Re: Modeler vs. consistency of DataMap/Entity/Attribute/Relationship

From: Andrus Adamchik (andru..bjectstyle.org)
Date: Sun Mar 02 2003 - 16:22:22 EST

  • Next message: Andrus Adamchik: ""small" CLOB support"

    Re: my earlier post in this thread.

    This issue was driving me nuts for so long, that I might as well modify
    my .qmail file, adding an autoreply with a long off-topic rant to any
    incoming message that contains "CayenneModeler is hard to modify" :-). I
    am sorry that I got too emotional.

    Re: the original events idea.

    After really thinking about the issue, here is my +1. It is a good idea
    to create a data structure that is "self maintained". A few ideas on that:

    1. I wonder if just having a single event and listener interface would
    be a better implementation though? Not sure how hard it will become to
    use it.

    2. A good place for such events is "project" package, since it deals
    with both mapping and access layers, treating them as just a tree (or a
    graph) of connected objects. (BTW, I was thinking about refactoring
    "display" events using a single class based on cayenne.project.ProjectPath )

    Andrus



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sun Mar 02 2003 - 16:23:51 EST