I might suggest that second-level caching should probably be
seperated and very easily pluggable. Plugging in arbitrary
implementations is fairly important in most significant apps I have
worked with which were able to use O/RM and a second level cache.
-Brian
On Apr 27, 2006, at 3:04 PM, Gentry, Michael ((Contractor)) wrote:
> I've not looked at JCS, but I was thinking just the other day that I'd
> like to be able to more finely tune the caching -- heavily cache
> entity
> A, but lightly cache entity B. Or set different times-to-live in the
> cache for different entities. Haven't had time to look into what is
> involved (among other things) in order to do that, though.
>
> /dev/mrg
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tore Halset [mailto:halse..vv.ntnu.no]
> Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 5:43 PM
> To: cayenne-de..ncubator.apache.org
> Subject: jcs - something for cayenne?
>
>
> Hello.
>
> I was at a java user group meeting today. A guy talked about jcs and
> it looked great. I have not used it before, but perhaps it can be
> used in cayenne as an alternative to the commons LRUMap? Anyone here
> used jcs for anything?
>
> http://jakarta.apache.org/jcs/
>
> What I would like to have in cayenne is the option to have less
> caching on some of the tables.
>
> - Tore.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Apr 28 2006 - 14:08:23 EDT