My take on that - it doesn't matter. We would also want WebWork,
Struts, etc. folks to choose Cayenne. Actually the main point is to
demonstrate the search capability, so even if it is vanilla JSP, it
will be ok. So I would say Tomas should probably stick with the
framework he is most comfortable with.
Andrus
On May 9, 2006, at 10:20 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
> Given that I'm not contributing directly to this, my suggestions
> probably have little weight. However, I would suggest either #1 or
> #3. #1 is nice because I think ideally we'd like to sell the
> Tapestry folks on Cayenne over Hibernate and a good solid app will
> help that. Additionally, Cayenne & Tapestry are both ASF projects,
> so it'd nice in that regard. #2 is not much different from #1, but
> is non-ASF.
> #3 is nice because nearly all examples use Cayenne in the context
> of a webapp and it'd be nice to see a good desktop app example.
>
> --
> Kevin
>
> On Tue, 09 May 2006 16:15:19 -0400, Tomas Jucius
> <entire..mail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have thought about demonstrating application and I would like to
>> implement
>> one of these:
>>
>> 1) Applicaton with Tapestry 4 front end. Could possibly change
>> Tapestry 3
>> example.
>> 2) Application with Wicket 1.2 front end. Could be good Wicket
>> example.
>> 3) Simple swing application.
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue May 09 2006 - 22:36:40 EDT