On Aug 6, 2006, at 10:18 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> On Aug 6, 2006, at 11:36 PM, Bill Dudney wrote:
>> 1) I feel strongly that we should limit access to the TCK to
>> committers (as recommended here [1]). The ASF leaves it up to the
>> PMC but I can't think of a good reason to let others have access
>> to the TCK.
>
> +1
>
>> 2) As I understand things we must keep the discussion of the TCK
>> in private. I'd like to propose that we use the PPMC list (renamed
>> to private recently) for those discussions.
>
> That means extending the PPMC subscription to all committers. Are
> there any problems with that?
>
I personally would like eventually to have PMC == Committers. And I
think we could/should be working towards that now as well. However
that causes me to think that we should probably have a new mailing
list for the tck, not archived and only available to subscribers.
I just sent a mail to the open-jcp list asking if anyone decided on a
naming scheme for these lists. I will keep you all posted.
-bd-
> Andrus
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Aug 07 2006 - 00:33:38 EDT