On Nov 22, 2006, at 3:11 AM, Tore Halset wrote:
> Do you think I could implement BlobHolder.readBlob with plain jdbc
> (generated from the model) as I did in BlobFault.getBlob()? The
> reason for doing this is that I need to bypass the ExtendedType
> stuff and have full control of the selecting transaction. Or is it
> possible to have the same level of control in a Query?
If possible, stay away from JDBC code in the query. A raw row
SQLTemplate with a manual Cayenne transaction should work as far as I
can tell. I don't see why ExtendedTypes would interfere with it.
> Writing is pretty easy if you just provide a MemoryBlob and set it.
> I think streaming insert would require som special stuff for each
> jdbc-driver.
Yeah, this may require some experimentation.
> BlobHolder could probably be the Fault like I did with BlobFault?
Probably ok for now, but we will likely change it in the future, as
with coming 3.0 POJO support faulting will be implemented differently.
Andrus
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Nov 22 2006 - 18:32:24 EST