> (I'm not sure of the state of Cayenne)
It looks like Geronimo are the caretakers of the Sun TCK at Apache
(something we, Cayenne developers, still can't get access to). While
Cayenne JPA provider requires fair amount of work to be compliant, it
would be really helpful in our own testing effort if we could test
our provider as a part of Geronimo assembly against the TCK. A
decision on the readiness of a given assembly can be made around a
release time, but it would be really nice if we could participate in
the TCK testing. How can we help with this BTW?
Andrus
On Jan 8, 2007, at 8:08 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> I don't think its just TCK. I agree we should scope the
> configuration to a limited set but I'm also concerned about making
> assemblies available. Given my math challenged 6 which is really 8
> I don't think we would want to generate every one of them. So I
> think from the download page perspective I think we need to
> identify the assemblies which may be something like:
>
> Jetty Axis OpenJPA
> Tomcat CXF OpenJPA
>
> (I'm not sure of the state of Cayenne)
>
> The provide a "stubbed out" version that would allow a user to
> install their preferred component via a plugin.
>
> Just a thought.
>
> On Jan 8, 2007, at 9:53 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>
>> On Jan 8, 2007, at 12:38 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>>>> rather than saying we'll only ship when we have all 6 it seems
>>>> more appropriate to me to say that we'll ship the assemblies
>>>> that people are willing to work on which includes TCK testing.
>>>> Any other ideas on how to handle this? Anyone interested in a
>>>> specific configuration and want to step up to TCK testing?
>>>
>>> I think maybe we should concentrate on packaging things as
>>> plugins, although this doesn't really affect what we run through
>>> the tck.
>>
>> Do we really need to run the TCK on every possible permutation?
>> Why don't we bless a specific configuration and then concentrate
>> the TCK effort on that specific assembly?
>>
>> --jason
>>
>>
>>
>
> Matt Hogstrom
> mat..ogstrom.org
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Jan 08 2007 - 13:19:25 EST