A little late, but I just noticed that the copyright statements haven't
been updated for 2007. I imagine only the files that have actually been
changed within then last 11 days need to be updated, and based on commit
messages, it doesn't seem like many.
The modeler, however, looks a bit odd saying that the copyright years
are 2001 - 2006 with the version string below saying (January 10 2007).
Someone smarter than me can decide whether there really is an issue here
or not.
-- Kevin> -----Original Message----- > From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:andru..bjectstyle.org] > Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 11:14 AM > To: cayenne-de..ncubator.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] 1.2.2 and 2.0.2 releases > > VOTE: approve 1.2.2 and 2.0.2 releases. > > http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/2.0.2/ > > > I posted artifacts for 1.2.2 and 2.0.2 releases. Note that > 1.2.2 is not "Apache-compliant" and will be released from > SourceForge. There is no signatures for 1.2.2 artifacts > either. Still doing a vote on the entire thing, as the code > is maintained by the same group of committers. > > Kevin and myself did some regression testing. The results are > shown below. If you have access to Oracle, Sybase or DB2, you > may run tests from the corresponding tags and report the results. > > 1.2.2: > hsqldb (passed) > derby (passed) > mysql (passed) > postgresql (passed) > frontbase (one failure [1]) > sqlserver (passed) > > 2.0.2: > hsqldb (passed) > derby (passed) > mysql (passed) > postgresql (passed) > frontbase (one failure [1]) > sqlserver (passed) > > Andrus > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/cayenne/browse/CAY-729 >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Jan 11 2007 - 12:04:10 EST