I'd say this is ok - everything we put in the releases was developed
before the New Year.
But this is a good catch - we need to update the files in the repo
going forward.
Andrus
On Jan 11, 2007, at 7:03 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
> A little late, but I just noticed that the copyright statements
> haven't
> been updated for 2007. I imagine only the files that have actually
> been
> changed within then last 11 days need to be updated, and based on
> commit
> messages, it doesn't seem like many.
>
> The modeler, however, looks a bit odd saying that the copyright years
> are 2001 - 2006 with the version string below saying (January 10
> 2007).
>
> Someone smarter than me can decide whether there really is an issue
> here
> or not.
>
> --
> Kevin
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:andru..bjectstyle.org]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 11:14 AM
>> To: cayenne-de..ncubator.apache.org
>> Subject: [VOTE] 1.2.2 and 2.0.2 releases
>>
>> VOTE: approve 1.2.2 and 2.0.2 releases.
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/2.0.2/
>>
>>
>> I posted artifacts for 1.2.2 and 2.0.2 releases. Note that
>> 1.2.2 is not "Apache-compliant" and will be released from
>> SourceForge. There is no signatures for 1.2.2 artifacts
>> either. Still doing a vote on the entire thing, as the code
>> is maintained by the same group of committers.
>>
>> Kevin and myself did some regression testing. The results are
>> shown below. If you have access to Oracle, Sybase or DB2, you
>> may run tests from the corresponding tags and report the results.
>>
>> 1.2.2:
>> hsqldb (passed)
>> derby (passed)
>> mysql (passed)
>> postgresql (passed)
>> frontbase (one failure [1])
>> sqlserver (passed)
>>
>> 2.0.2:
>> hsqldb (passed)
>> derby (passed)
>> mysql (passed)
>> postgresql (passed)
>> frontbase (one failure [1])
>> sqlserver (passed)
>>
>> Andrus
>>
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/cayenne/browse/CAY-729
>>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Jan 11 2007 - 12:11:17 EST