I noticed that late last night. Their algorithm is very wrong. The
code was originally imported from CVS and should have revisions going
back to 2001 or 2002. E.g. this test shows 2005 as the earliest
revision for DataObject (due to CVS reorg, as CVS does not track file
movement between directories):
svn log DataObject.java
....
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r404210 | aadamchik | 2005-11-04 12:19:53 +0200 (Fri, 04 Nov 2005) |
2 lines
But anyways, I removed the branches - they are indeed do us no good.
Andrus
On Jul 30, 2007, at 2:32 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
>
> On 30/07/2007, at 4:36 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
>> BTW, just added 1.2 and 2.0 branches to OHLOH (it still indexes
>> them). Otherwise the project appears only 7 months old.
>
> That will not work unless you add the old ObjectStyle repository. I
> think you just tripled the size of the project artificially, but
> didn't make it older.
>
> Ari
>
>
>
> -------------------------->
> Aristedes Maniatis
> phone +61 2 9660 9700
> PGP fingerprint 08 57 20 4B 80 69 59 E2 A9 BF 2D 48 C2 20 0C C8
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Jul 30 2007 - 03:35:07 EDT