Re: Why the "unpublished" suffix?

From: Andrus Adamchik (andru..bjectstyle.org)
Date: Wed Oct 24 2007 - 03:39:12 EDT

  • Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: [CONFIRMED] Re: Maven again and again :( !"

    I think no - somehow I feel there will be "cayenne-jdk1.6-
    unpublished" in a not so distant future.

    Andrus

    On Oct 24, 2007, at 10:28 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:

    >
    > On 24/10/2007, at 2:15 AM, Kevin Menard wrote:
    >
    >> It's to differentiate between assemblies that are published as
    >> JARs and
    >> those that are used simply to build larger assemblies that are
    >> published as
    >> JARs.
    >
    > Now that 1.4 and 1.5 are being merged, do we want to rename that
    > project cayenne-core?
    >
    > Ari
    >
    >
    >
    > -------------------------->
    > Aristedes Maniatis
    > phone +61 2 9660 9700
    > PGP fingerprint 08 57 20 4B 80 69 59 E2 A9 BF 2D 48 C2 20 0C C8
    >
    >
    >

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Oct 24 2007 - 03:39:48 EDT