2008/8/10, Michael Gentry <blacknex..mail.com>:
>
> For a to-many, it isn't as simple as adding an "s" at the end for a
> to-many. At least not in English. For example, if you have a to-man
> to an Address object, you probably want "getAddresses" and not
> "getAddresss" as the method name.
I'm also for "Array" suffix. Anyways, one can implement strategy as desired.
Pluraling is not such trivial task, and my knowledge of English grammar is
not so good to implement that myself.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sun Aug 10 2008 - 13:45:27 EDT