Re: [VOTE] 3.0M5 Release

From: Kevin Menard (nirvdru..mail.com)
Date: Tue Dec 09 2008 - 07:41:58 EST

  • Next message: Kevin Menard: "Re: [VOTE] 3.0M5 Release"

    I've put up new artifacts for 3.0M5 that should address the problems
    Tore and Andrus encountered.

    I refreshed on voting policy as well. Releases cannot be vetoed, so
    we can push ahead with the release now. However, we are looking at
    new artifacts, so I would like to see at least three +1 votes on the
    new artifacts before we cut the release. The GPG sig and MD5
    checksums should be rechecked as well.

    I will not be restarting the 72 hour window. Three +1 will do it.
    I'd expect any other blocker issues to have been uncovered. 

    -- 
Kevin

    On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Tore Halset <halse..vv.ntnu.no> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> -1
>
> as it breaks my production system as described in an email from me 5/12. I
> am currently tesing this with Andrus latest fix.
>
>  - Tore.
>
> On Dec 2, 2008, at 14:10, Kevin Menard wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm raising the vote release Cayenne 3.0 M5.  I've prepared and signed
>> the 3.0M5 binaries and they are available here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~kmenard/release/3.0M5/
>>
>> Here is my +1 for the release.
>>
>> --
>> Kevin
>>
>
>

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Dec 09 2008 - 07:42:28 EST