+1 from me as well.
-- KevinOn Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 3:05 AM, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote: > +1 - Looking good. > > > On Dec 9, 2008, at 2:41 PM, Kevin Menard wrote: > >> I've put up new artifacts for 3.0M5 that should address the problems >> Tore and Andrus encountered. >> >> I refreshed on voting policy as well. Releases cannot be vetoed, so >> we can push ahead with the release now. However, we are looking at >> new artifacts, so I would like to see at least three +1 votes on the >> new artifacts before we cut the release. The GPG sig and MD5 >> checksums should be rechecked as well. >> >> I will not be restarting the 72 hour window. Three +1 will do it. >> I'd expect any other blocker issues to have been uncovered. >> >> -- Kevin >> >> >> >> On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Tore Halset <halse..vv.ntnu.no> wrote: >>> >>> Hello. >>> >>> -1 >>> >>> as it breaks my production system as described in an email from me 5/12. >>> I >>> am currently tesing this with Andrus latest fix. >>> >>> - Tore. >>> >>> On Dec 2, 2008, at 14:10, Kevin Menard wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I'm raising the vote release Cayenne 3.0 M5. I've prepared and signed >>>> the 3.0M5 binaries and they are available here: >>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~kmenard/release/3.0M5/ >>>> >>>> Here is my +1 for the release. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Kevin >>>> >>> >>> >> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sat Dec 13 2008 - 09:10:08 EST