Anyways, I'm ok with reverting CAY-1009 but reopening it for 3.1
2010/2/10 Andrey Razumovsky <razumovsky.andre..mail.com>
> However, I think I could have called addToRelated() programmically without
> knowing name of relationship... Not sure though
>
> 2010/2/10 Andrey Razumovsky <razumovsky.andre..mail.com>
>
>
>>>
>>> Now back to 3.0... Could you explain why there is a mismatch in the
>>> mapping? I.e. why can't you remap (A -> C ; C -> B) as either (A -> C ; C ->
>>> A) or (B -> C ; C -> B) from the application design perspective?
>>>
>>> Andrus
>>>
>>
>> In my case I don't have obj relationships A->C or B->C at all because I
>> don't need them. Only C->B, others are runtime
>
>
>
>
> --
> Andrey
>
-- Andrey
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Feb 10 2010 - 04:34:50 EST