Re: CAY-1378, CAY-1009...

From: Andrus Adamchik (andru..bjectstyle.org)
Date: Wed Feb 10 2010 - 04:50:43 EST

  • Next message: Kevin Menard: "Re: CAY-1378, CAY-1009..."

    On Feb 10, 2010, at 11:27 AM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
    > However, I think I could have called addToRelated() programmically
    > without
    >> knowing name of relationship... Not sure though

    I just tried with a one-way to-many relationship, and that works, as
    runtime relationships are added correctly if there's no explicit sub/
    superclass relationship mismatch.

    > Anyways, I'm ok with reverting CAY-1009 but reopening it for 3.1

    I will do that. I think there is a clear workaround for all affected
    users (and I still don't understand why people use the type of mapping
    that is causing the problem. It doesn't look logically correct to me).

    Andrus

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Feb 10 2010 - 04:51:18 EST