Please correct me if I'm wrong, but even though this relationship
exists, it's looked up lazily, correct?
In other words, if he gets a row from ware, there will be a hook to get
all the orders but they won't actually be looked up until and unless he
calls the method that asks for them. So, even though there is potential
information available that we don't need, as long as we never use the
information, there's no performance penalty...
Or am I just being overly optimistic?
Todd
On Aug 3, 2004, at 3:14 AM, Jürgen Saar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got a problem with the fact that reverse relations are mandatory
> in cayenne.
>
> Example:
>
> There is a 1 to 1 Realationship between OderPosition and wares
> When I select a row in my wares, there will be all orders
> that deal with this in this ware-object.
>
> This is not the behavior I would like.
>
> Any hints ?
>
> --- Juergen ---
> ________________________________________________________________
> Verschicken Sie romantische, coole und witzige Bilder per SMS!
> Jetzt neu bei WEB.DE FreeMail: http://freemail.web.de/?mc=021193
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Aug 03 2004 - 14:32:32 EDT