Re: Many to Many Relation

From: Mike Kienenberger (mkienen..laska.net)
Date: Thu Jun 30 2005 - 12:37:37 EDT

Next message: Dhruti Ramani: "Re: Many to Many Relation"

Previous message: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: Many to Many Relation"
In reply to: Todd O'Bryan: "Re: Many to Many Relation"
Next in thread: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: Many to Many Relation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Todd O'Bryan <toddobrya..ac.com> wrote:
> I had a problem with this myself; I think we could improve the docs
> on this point. Let me see if I can clarify a bit.

I completely agree -- I also had problems with this first try.

Maybe someone should create a sample data map showing a flattened
relationship, and also document how it was created, step-by-step.

-Mike

Next message: Dhruti Ramani: "Re: Many to Many Relation"
Previous message: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: Many to Many Relation"
In reply to: Todd O'Bryan: "Re: Many to Many Relation"
Next in thread: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: Many to Many Relation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Jun 30 2005 - 12:34:42 EDT