2008/3/10, Andrus Adamchik <andrus@objectstyle.org>:
>
> Architecture-wise ROP is ideally suited for work over RMI (not sure
> how different Spring RMI compared to Java RMI?).
Spring greatly simplifies RMI. Best seen on example at
http://www.roseindia.net/spring/springpart4.shtml
It just that nobody
> cared to implement an appropriate service so far.
How likely it is this service to be implemented by you or any active team
member by the end of April? Wouldn't this feature push Cayenne more into
enterprise league? It seems nobody is using Cayenne in the middle tier and
pass data objects to presentation tier. If this would work transparently, it
would save a lot of manual work coding DTOs and merging to/from them to/from
data objects.
Cheers,
Borut
Maybe worth poking
> around porting ROP to RMI (there may be issues, like
> CAY-979, but I am sure they can be solved if we identify what exactly
> is wrong).
>
>
> Andrus
>
>
> On Mar 10, 2008, at 8:01 PM, Borut Bolčina wrote:
>
> > Hello list,
> >
> > is anyone here using Cayenne in 3-tier architecture?
> >
> > Scenario: several instances of web app (JSP) with no database access
> > connecting to middle tier with Cayenne for data access to one or more
> > databases. Middle tier is a RMI server in Spring flavor. I am also
> > thinking
> > to provide load balancing and high availability with OpenSpaces for
> > this RMI
> > sever(s). Setting up a web server to use ROP is not an option.
> >
> > If anyone has an experience to share, I would be glad to discuss it.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Borut
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Mar 12 2008 - 19:45:04 EDT