#1. I can have a look. Please find JIRA or create a new one
#2. You should create table ID as ObjAttrbute and attach
ExpressionFactory.noMatchExp("id", getId())
2009/6/10 Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.harbo..ylin.com>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Andrus Adamchik<andru..bjectstyle.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Jun 5, 2009, at 11:43 AM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> >
> >> 1. I can't use expression.match() because it will fail when the
> >> expression contains
> >> an array in the path. I.e. matchExp(role.members.user, user) here
> >> "members"
> >> will return a list, and this causes an exception for .match(), whereas
> it
> >> works
> >> fine in a query.
> >
> > Yeah, this is a known limitation for in memory processing. We probably
> even
> > have a Jira to fix it.
>
> If you find the JIRA # I'll see if we can't have a go at fixing it...
>
> >> 2. In the above statement I don't know how to add a andExp() to only
> >> return
> >> "this", so I get a bigger query result than I need + unecessary post
> >> processing.
> >> I've run into this problem previously as well, without finding an
> >> elegant solution.
> >
> > Not sure I understand this.
>
> Since I can't use .match() I want to run expression against the database to
> see if "this" matches the filter, but I don't want *lots* of returned
> results where I need to check that "this" is in the list of objects.
>
> If I could create an expression that filtered out all objects that was not
> "this", then I would know that the object matched the expression if
> a single record was returned.
>
> --
> Øyvind Harboe
> Embedded software and hardware consulting services
> http://consulting.zylin.com
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Jun 10 2009 - 11:41:16 EDT