Andrus,
can you do a quick diff between 2.0 and 3.0 cayenne.xml version? Maybe that
> will give us some idea.
>
>
I had done a diff and I guess the problem was so obvious I missed it the
first time. The only notable difference is that the 3.0 cayenne.xml is
missing the view element:
<view name="dataview0" location="dataview0.view.xml" />
I redid the conversion to verify that this is what happened the first time
and that it didn't get taken out some other way.
I manually added it in to the converted file and all appears to be working
as it should.
Should I report a bug about this? If so please let me know where I go to do
this.
Thanks for your help.
Mark
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org>wrote:
> usual disclaimer about no support for DV in 3.0, but.. can you do a quick
> diff between 2.0 and 3.0 cayenne.xml version? Maybe that will give us some
> idea.
>
> Andrus
>
>
> On Jun 4, 2010, at 6:29 PM, Mark Fraser wrote:
>
> I recently converted a project which heavily uses data views from Cayenne
>> 2.x to 3.x.
>>
>> As far as I can tell I have everything working (at runtime) but the one
>> known problem is that the 3.x data view modeler does not properly load the
>> cayenne.xml. By not properly loading I mean that the dataview elements do
>> not show up at all. The map does show up in the Entity view but with no
>> children.
>>
>> The cayenne.xml that I am trying to load is of course the one that I
>> converted by loading the 2.x version into the 3.x Cayenne modeler (the
>> regular modeler not the data view one) and allowing it to convert the
>> project.
>>
>> FWIW the 3.x data view modeler DOES properly load the unconverted 2.x
>> cayenne.xml.
>>
>> Has anyone been able to get this to work?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Mark
>>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sat Jun 05 2010 - 06:00:34 UTC